MARSH FAMILIES OF KENT

DNA PROJECT

FTDNA CLOSE MATCHES

Return Home
To My Results
To My Deep Ancestry
To Some UK Distant Cousins
To Some European Distant Cousins

Purpose

There are many ways of comparing the various DNA results available to us. In previous pages I have not included those USA families who have not traced their ancestry beyond the USA. I have noted that a considerable number of SMGF results of families in the USA were shown to have 70% or better results compared with mine. Rather than plot any of those at this time, I am using this page to show USA families that FTDNA have reported to have very close matches with my results and who would have the same distant roots as mine.

The Figures.

The following table compares my results from the combined 25-marker FTDNA analysis and the 36-marker SMGF analysis of my DNA samples  to those of close matches reported by FTDNA. If all persons participated in the Sorenson analysis covering more markers, a more accurate picture of the possible relationships would be obtained. The Wilkinson results are for the FTDNA 37-marker analysis.
 
     D 
     Y
     S
_________
Participant		 3
8
5
a
 

 

 3
8
5
b
 

 

 3
8
8
 
 

 

 3
8
9
I
 

 

 3
8
9
II
 

 

 3
9
0
 
 

 

 3
9
1
 
 

 

 3
9
2
 
 

 

 3
9
3
 
 

 

 3
9
4
/
1
9
**		 4
2
6
 
 

 

 4
3
7
 
 

 

 4
3
8
 
 

 

 4
3
9
 
 

 

 4
4
1
 
 

 

 4
4
2
 
 

 

 4
4
4
 
 

 

 4
4
5
 
 

 

 4
4
6
 
 

 

 4
4
7
 
 

**

 4
4
8
 
 

 

 4
4
9
 
 

 

 4
5
2
 
 

 

 4
5
4
 
 

 

 4
5
5
 
 

 

 4
5
6
 
 

 

 4
5
8
 
 

 

 4
5
9
a
 

 

 4
5
9
b
 

 

 4
6
0
 
 

 

 4
6
1
 
 

 

 4
6
2
 
 

 

 4
6
4
a
 

 

 4
6
4
b
 

 

 4
6
4
c
 

 

 4
6
4
d
 

 

 5
7
0
 
 

 

 5
7
6
 
 

 

 6
0
7
 
 

 

 C
D
Y
a
 

 

 C
D
Y
b
 

 

 GG
AA
T1
B0
7

 

 Y
C
A
I
I
a		 Y
C
A
I
I
b		 Y-
GA
TA
-A
10

 

 Y-
GA
TA
-C
4

 

 Y-
GA
TA
-H
4

**
Me 15 15 13 13 31 20 10 12 14 16 11 14 11 11 13 12 13 11 11 25 23 26 31 11 11 13 15 08 10 10 11 12 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- 11 19 21 11 21 10
Wilkinson 15 15 13 13 31 20 10 12 14 16 11 14 10 11 -- 12 -- -- -- 25 23 26 -- 11 11 14 16 08 10 10 -- -- 11 14 14 14 20 16 14 33 39 -- 19 21 -- -- 10
Hooper 1 15 15 13 12 30 20 10 12 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 26 -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Hooper 2 15 15 13 12 29 20 10 12 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 26 -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
May 1 15 15 13 12 30 20 10 13 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 27 -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
May 2 15 15 13 12 30 20 10 13 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 27 -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
May 3 15 15 13 12 30 20 10 13 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 27 -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Common 15 15 13 -- -- 20 10 -- 14 16 11 14 -- 11 -- -- -- -- -- 25 23 -- -- 11 11 -- 15 08 10 -- -- -- 11 14 14 14 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
NOTE:  I have used the Sorenson calibration in this table. The results listed under the markers tagged with ** are those that differ from the FTDNA calibration. To convert FTDNA scores to Sorenson scores: DYS394/19 add 1; DYS448 add 3:  Y-GATA-H4 add 1.

I have labelled a row 'Common' to show markers that predominate. These can be considered as part of the DNA for a founder of a branch in the world family tree. In the diagram below I have started off with the Common branch and then attempted to show how the sub-branches may have developed from that over time, as indicated by the mutations in the table.
 

                 |--------------------------Marsh (Me)
           |-----|
           |     |--------------------------Wilkinson
           |
Common-----|
           |
           |     |--------------------------Hooper
           |-----|
                 |--------------------------May
 
 

Comparing The Trees in Detail

A set of trees with detail for some of  the persons above is shown below. Exact connections are known for the Hoopers, their common ancestor being George born about 1730/40.
 
 


MARSH, England
HOOPER, USA
HOOPER.USA
WILKINSON,USA
William Abt 1550
 
 
Of Barham, Kent
 
 
|
 
 
William 1594
 
 
Barham, Kent
 
 
|
 
 
John 1622
 
 
Barham, Kent
 
 
|
 
 
Abraham 1645
 
 
Barham, Kent
|
John 1682
Barham, Kent
|
John 1711
Barham, Kent 
 |
Abraham 1748
George 
 Abt 1730/40
Samuel 1787
Barham, Kent
Birth Country
 Unknown 
USA
|
|
|
|
Abraham 1774
George 1764
Benjamin 1784
James C 1816
Barham, Kent
Virginia. USA
USA
USA
|
|
|
|
George 1798
Joseph 1802
William 1837
Arba J 1849
        Wingham ,Kent 
NC, USA
USA
USA
|
|
|
|
John 1840
George 1832
John 1871
Clifford 1876
Denton, Kent
NC, USA
USA
USA
|
|
|
|
John 1859
Rufus 1861
Tandy 1905
Theodore P 1898
Folkestone, Kent
NC, USA
USA
USA
|
|
|
|
Ernest 1881
Louis 1897
Hooper 2 1947
Wilkinson 1927
Folkestone, Kent
NC, USA
USA
USA
|
|
|
William 1923
Hooper 1 19--
Wilkinson 1950
South Norwood, Surrey
USA
USA